Biogen Idec: The Path to Co-Generation
Introduction
Why does a major biotechnology company in the Boston area decide
to take a nearly unprecedented move and install an entire power plant in
the basement of its new building? The answer to that question is not a
simple one – but is nonetheless important for all businesses in and around
the Boston area to address as they assess their own energy needs. The
“brave new world” of energy management will require all companies and
institutions to be smarter, more self sufficient, and more flexible in terms
of how they assess and manage their energy needs. If they do not, they will
be forced to spend more money and incur a greater risk of losing power.
Biogen Idec's decision to build a co-generation plant in the basement
of its new building in Cambridge was based on an analysis of the needs and
the risks as the business continues to build. Only with the expertise of a
company like SourceOne, Inc., one of the nation's leading private utility
companies, was any of this able to happen. Biogen's decision represents
an opportunity for other businesses in congested urban areas, as they
go forward, to think innovatively and creatively and to operate more
efficiently, with less risk and less cost, to meet their energy needs.
What is Co-Generation?
Co-generation, a process and technology that has been available for
at least a century, allows one utility plant to produce more than one form
of usable energy. For instance, such plants will burn one type of fuel,
recover heat from that combustion, and then use it to generate another
form of energy, often steam. This means that co-generation plants are
much more efficient than many of the older power-producing generators.
Co-generation can improve a plant's efficiency as much as 85%.
Increased efficiency not only means lower costs for the consumer, but
produces a much less severe impact on the surrounding environment.
Greater output efficiencies from new plants translate into reduced ratio of
emissions to the air.
Additionally, it is a sustainable form
of energy generation, something that is becoming more and more necessary
for businesses and individual consumers alike to survive in today’s economy.
Improved reliability means reduced vulnerability to outages and the
economic burden attributable to them. Loss of product and production
restart costs can be enormous vulnerabilities to the biotech and
biopharmaceutical industries. For these economic and environmental
reasons, and because of the increased push by regulators and public officials
to create distributed generation energy resources in congested areas,
co-generation is an old idea whose time is fast approaching.
Biogen Idec Inc. is a global biotechnology
leader with leading products and capabilities in oncology, neurology
and immunology, and is committed to transforming scientific discoveries
into advances in healthcare. The company's core capabilities include
drug discovery, research and development, biomanufacturing, and a
global commercial infrastructure.
A company with facilities all
around the world, Biogen maintains one of its two major research centers
in Cambridge, Massachusetts, adjacent to intellectual leaders at Harvard
University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The
company's second major research center is in San Diego, California, a
state that has also dealt with energy reliability issues. But this Cambridge
location—which gives Biogen Idec a competitive advantage—also
presented some initial challenges with its aging energy infrastructure
and deregulated energy market. Cambridge provided Biogen the
cultural and intellectual climate it needed, while its legacy energy infrastructure
presented a tremendous risk for its operational needs. For Biogen,
reliability of service was paramount.
In 1999, Biogen Idec called upon
SourceOne, Inc. to help assess their energy needs. In Massachusetts,
deregulation was looming on the horizon and it was clear that it would
have a huge impact on the future of Biogen. When this energy deregulation
took shape in 2000 and 2001, the professionals at SourceOne were
able to project that it was going to increase instability to the energy
service that Biogen relied on heavily. That instability was caused not only
by capacity concerns, but by the financial troubles of those seeking
to capitalize on deregulation by purchasing key power plants.
In 2003, SourceOne recommended that Biogen undergo a feasibility
study to see if co-generation was indeed a viable option for the company.
SourceOne recognized that co-generation had its challenges: for
a co-generation plant to work properly, it needs to be geographically close
to where its power is consumed. Additionally, although a mature
technological concept, co-generation was then seen as an unconventional
idea in a new marketplace of deregulated energy.
But there were also factors in favor
of co-generation: Biogen's primary need, still to this day, is for reliable
energy in order to maintain its biomanufacturing and research
capabilities. Major blackouts that hit the U.S. in 2001 and 2003 helped
to convince the decision-makers at Biogen that they had to take control
of their energy generation. Furthermore, as SourceOne explained, a
declaration of bankruptcy by the company owning the closest power
plant, the Kendall Station, convinced the biotech business that their energy
future was not in their own control.
SourceOne believed Biogen was
a good candidate for co-generation because, logistically, they fit key
requirements. By purchasing property for a new building, situated close
to the rest of campus, Biogen's co-generation facility would be in a
contained area close to where the energy would be consumed and
have a predictable load. The metrics for both steam and electricity also
lined up nicely. Even more importantly, Biogen Idec had the kind of
corporate culture that encourages innovative problem-solving and the
kind of people who can swallow the recommendations of knowledgeable
advisors—like SourceOne—and then implement them.
The Facility
Biogen Idec’s co-generation facility
is located in the basement of its new building—30 feet below ground
level. The facility will provide three sources of electricity as well as three
sources of steam to the Cambridge campus, therefore providing the
reliability that the needs of Biogen demand. Additionally, the facility will
stay connected to the district system, thus relieving stress on the region's
power grid.
Costing around $12 million in
capital, the plant will save Biogen at least $3 to $4 million annually. It will
produce 5.6 megawatts of electrical energy, and 120,000 million pounds
of firm steam capacity. Furthermore, SourceOne, who oversaw
development of the project, required two additional boilers to ensure that
redundancy was added to the system. It will be one of the most reliable
energy generation plants in the area.
Recommendations for Energy Needs
Unfortunately, energy cost increases
and volatility are phenomena that are here to stay. Businesses around the
region and across the country must therefore learn how to deal with each
of them in order for their industries to thrive. SourceOne's experience
working with Biogen Idec can teach a number of lessons to businesses
when it comes to their own energy management needs.
- Assess. Analyze. Work to understand the complexity of the energy
market, then assess and analyze your own company's energy use
and future needs in light of how they impact your business.
Unlike many major companies, cost was not the primary factor
for Biogen. Reliability was. But Biogen needed to first come to
terms with what was contributing to an unreliable energy system—deregulation, the financial problems of outside actors, and an aging
physical infrastructure.
- Even if you cannot change your infrastructure, you can change your
operating behaviors.
- Think creatively.
- Know what you don't know. Learn from an expert.
The View from Biogen Idec
Ed Dondero, Director of Facilities for Biogen Idec, good-naturedly claims
that the decision to install a co-generation plant in the company's new
facility was "rooted in desperation." Having made a serious commitment
to maintaining their presence in Cambridge, Massachusetts, the
biotechnology company turned to Brian Casey, CEO of SourceOne, Inc.,
to help them address some of the considerable challenges they faced
when it came to their energy needs.
"Our long-term contract with the local steam company was not
favorable," says Dondero. "The other options, like only installing boilers to
produce steam, were problematic. It forced the project to become bigger
than we intended, but ultimately, it was the right time for the co-generation
plant." According to Dondero, the co-generation plant makes financial
sense—initially, it appeared as if the plant would save Biogen Idec $3 million
annually, but it has become clear that it will actually save them $4 million
annually. The plant will pay for itself within 3 years. "As utility rates rise,
this decision has become more lucrative," says Dondero. As for the
environmental benefits, Dondero believes that the co-generation plant's
efficiency helped ensure a smoother ride through the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts' permitting process.
Dondero has two recommendations for any business exploring the
co-generation option:
- Align yourself with someone who can objectively identify the
alternatives. So many projects fail because they take a narrow view
of the whole selection process. SourceOne, a private utility company
that has acted as an outsourced energy manager for a variety of
facilities, was the perfect choice for Biogen because of the breadth
of their experience.
- Get out in front of the issues associated with this kind of a project,
particularly some of the political concerns. Because this was an
innovative option, both companies recognized a need to be explaining
to the surrounding community and permitting agencies why this was
such a valuable development. It took some high level discussions,
between Biogen and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, but it
happened because of careful planning.